Openpedia.org > The whole NPG / Wikimedia thing ~ Stephen's Web ~ by Stephen Downes

[Stephen's Web ~ OLDaily] Re: The whole NPG / Wikimedia thing. Anymouse, August 1, 2009. I think that there are other actors on this stage whose behavior needs to be looked at. These are intermediaries who, for a piece of the action, enable and encourage museums ...

Previous [Previous] ResourceShelf » Blog Archive » Wikimedia Nether...

Next [Next] The Use of Blogs and Wikis in Scholarly Communication « U...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[Past Thinking] Past Thinking » Blog Archive » National Portrait Gallery / Wikimedia: I was rather disappointed to have received this response to my post privately, which itself misunderstood what I was suggesting, as it means I cannot publish it here with my response, but I can say that I hope this anonymous individual will maintain a correspondence to make very clear a) what his/her opinion is and b) how projects like Wikimedia Commons can work more openly _with_ organisations like NPG so conflict like this doesn’t have to arise again. I can say, however, that the individual cited the Bridgeman Art Library vs Corel case in the US in his/her response, to which I replied that the ruling does not apply as a UK precedent as many of us who have been involved in collections digitisation realised a long time ago.

[Art Market Monitor] Wikipedia's Theft in Context | Art Market Monitor: “Representatives or publicists will contact us” horrified at the photographs on the site, said Jay Walsh, a spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates the Wikipedia encyclopedias in more than 200 languages. “They will say: ”˜I have this image.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, ,