Openpedia.org > Defending the Wiki World Vision

[Dennis Dunleavy] After calling into question the reliability of using WikiPedia as an online reference resource, a study conducted by the journal Nature found only...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

Dvorak Uncensoredhttp://www.dvorak.org/blog [Dvorak Uncensored] Wikipedia ”” New Target for New Gags!: Will Someone Shoot this A-hole?, Scratches defeated by Nissan’s new car paint, Death Poll, Data disasters dog computer users, Wikipedia tightens online rules, Police say woman mistakes cheese for cocaine, hires hit man, With love at Christmas - a set of stem cells, Warming Could Free Far More Carbon from High Arctic Soil dooming us ALL!, Historic Books About San Francisco, Funny Coincidence, Killing Google: Online Content Cannot Remain Free, Triangulation">6

http://thetension.blogspot.com [THE TENSION] Test of Wikipedia Lacks Significant Samples: Now in the news as a result of that story is the results of Nature.com's test comparing 42 science articles in Wikipedia to matching articles in Encyclopedia Britannica. The news stories about the test paint Wikipedia in a favorable way, much to the glee of bloggers all over the Web.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, , , , ,