Openpedia.org > 3 More Studies Examine Wikipedia's Page 1 Google Rankings ...
[Search Engine Watch] Where Wikipedia did appear on the first page on Google, it often took one of the top three positions, where most clicks occur. Even in transactional searches, Wikipedia was one of the top three results 63 percent of the time.
[Bloggers' Insight - daily blog world] 3 More Studies Examine Wikipedia's Page 1 Google Ratings | Daily ...: Conductor examined 2,000 educational and transactional queries: 1,000 key phrases each for educational and transactional queries. Within the report, they observe that &ldquoan analysis of the subset of navigational key phrases demonstrated Wikipedia was largely not visible for most of these queries, therefore we didn't develop a full analysis of those terms.&rdquo
[Brijesh Rupareliya - Lead Internet Marketer | Ahmedabad - Gujarat - India] Think Wikipedia dominates the Google rankings? Think again ...: About Brijesh Rupareliya This is Brijesh Rupareliya - Working As a Professional SEO Analyst in Ahmedabad and Having 4 Year of Experience in Search Engine Optimization [SEO], Search Engine Marketing [SEM], Social Media Optimization [SMO], Pay per click management [PPC], Affiliate marketing and Online Reputation Management Field.I take over lot of projects. I have very good command over both On-Page and Off-Page Optimization.
[Conductor Blog] Wikipedia in the SERPs: Appears on Page 1 for 60% of ...: - we gathered a total of 2,000 keywords: 1,000 keywords each for informational and transactional queries (an analysis of a subset of navigational keywords showed Wikipedia was largely not visible for these kinds of queries, so we did not complete a full analysis of these terms.) In breaking out results by informational vs. transactional queries, we felt that Shari made a good point–
[Best SEO Training Institutes in Pune, Classes, Courses, SEO Experts, India] Wikipedia Ranks Only 46% On Google's Page One (Study) « Best ...: Conductors study reports also found that Wikipedia doesnt rank on page one or even two for about 29 to 30 percent of the keywords it studied.
[Search Engine Watch] Bing, Not Google, Favors Wikipedia More Often in Search Results ...: This study also didn’t take into account any personalization that you might see with Google’s Search Plus Your World or Bing’s integration with Facebook. Another factor that could reduce visibility of Wikipedia could be the appearance of AdWords ads over the organic results, or the inclusion of universal results, such as news, images, or videos.
[The TechBlock] Google's Chrome Web Store riddled with malware, says expert: Assolini identified a “malicious extension hosted on Google’s own servers [that] contained hidden code that can ‘gain complete control’ of the user’s Facebook profile.” Google promptly deleted the malware once Assolini’s firm brought it to the company’s attention, but Assolini noted that the Chrome Web Store, which Ars Technica calls the “software equivalent of a Wikipedia-like bazaar,” is home to host of similarly sneaky applications, and some are peddled by the same company behind the Facebook ruse.
[Bloggers' Insight - daily blog world] Marketing Methods Past the Google Bubble | Daily Blog World: Their latest questionable move saw the consolidation of information collected from customers across all Google services, which not just captivated the privacy problem but additionally added fuel towards the accusations of the results return prejudice towards their very own items and services pages.  Certain sources inside the Google organisation also have accepted that ale sites to PageRank by utilizing organic Search engine optimization key phrases alone without purchasing PPC ad compensated search looks apt to be limited later on.